01
Seller onboarding
Sellers must provide reviewable identity, operating domain, catalog context, documentation posture, and claim policy before being treated as a credible source.
Seller standards
Verification standards before visibility.
isthissafe.fyi treats seller participation as a documented trust process. Product claims, COAs, proof freshness, and enforcement posture stay visible before any seller earns confidence.
04
Verification pillars
05
Enforcement levels
0
Legal guarantees implied
Baseline policy
A seller profile is not a certification.
The standard is stricter than marketplace copy and more transparent than a simple score. Every claim should connect back to a source, a freshness window, and a proof gap if one remains.
02
Product verification
Each product is reviewed on its own merits: name, form, stated strength, compounds, lot context, research-use language, source documents, and proof gaps.
03
Testing and COAs
COAs should be dated, product- or lot-specific, attributable, method-aware, and connected to the listing or source record being represented.
04
Proof freshness
Claims tied to inventory, price, lot, batch, or lab results must be refreshed when source facts change. Stale proof stays caveated.
Claim discipline
Proof cannot be allowed to become marketing theater.
Seller language is reviewed for overreach. COAs can support identity and QA context, but they do not prove clinical suitability, medical appropriateness, or guaranteed outcomes.
Medical treatment claims
Guaranteed outcome language
Dosing or protocol claims presented as proof
Testimonials framed as evidence
Purity claims without current product-level documentation
Clinical suitability inferred from COA or purity testing alone
Enforcement ladder
Misrepresentation is handled in levels, with records preserved.
Enforcement is proportional and documented. Serious or repeated misrepresentation may result in removal, public trust warnings, or legal escalation where appropriate.
Level 1
Clarification
Request updated documents, source context, product/lot mapping, or claim clarification.
Level 2
Trust flag
Mark unresolved gaps, lower confidence, or make QA/COA posture visibly partial.
Level 3
Restriction
Pause publication, comparison visibility, white-label routing, or partner eligibility.
Level 4
Removal
Reject onboarding or remove seller/product profiles when misrepresentation remains unresolved.
Level 5
Escalation
Preserve records, escalate to legal review, and may result in legal escalation where appropriate.
Trust is earned by documented proof, current source material, and claim discipline. Anything less remains visibly caveated.
Check product proof